----- Original Message -----

from
Deconstructing the De facto Courtroom:
lawful remedy to kidnapping under color of law


                Appendix A. Points of interest

    Summarized from August 31, 2008 broadcast of
                 TAKE NO PRISONERS
                             first hour
            Republic Broadcasting Network
                     (courtesy of a listener)



1. I am who I say I am.  Can you please identify yourself for the record?

2. Is that your given name, sir?  Were you Christened "Magistrate Jones" or is that some sort of legal fiction appellation?

3. By what authority do you come before me?

4. By "representative," do you mean an attorney?

5. Are you trying to engage me in a controversy, sir?

6. Do you have a copy of the administrative agreement in front of you?

7. Why are you trying to introduce me to an agent of controversy (ie. attorney) when you have a copy of the settlement and estoppel in front of you?

8. Would you please state for the record the specific jurisdiction that you are claiming?

9. How am I to plead if you will not state the jurisdiction? In the common law I would have to plead innocent, isn't that correct?

10. Is there an injured party of substance that you can point out, sir?

11. What is the law form by which you are claiming jurisdiction?

12. Is the criminal jurisdiction you're referring to common law, admiralty, penal, or commercial?

13. Did you say penal?  Are you not aware of the supreme court rulings that a sovereign man is not subject to statutory authority?

14. For and on the record sir, if you are professing to be acting under statutory authority, then does that not include the Uniform Commercial Code? (Leads to discussion of settlement and the default.)

15. Do you not have a copy of the administrative agreement to which all parties have agreed willfully and to which Mr. Jones has waived all rights of objection?

16. Common Law? Where is the injured party?  Can you have a corporation or agent thereof making a claim as an injured party in the common law?

17. Admiralty?  Can you please point out the arrested vessel?  I don't see it here today�Oh, you're confessing that there is no vessel?  Well sir, then there is no court.  Isn't that correct? (See section on attacking the claim that it is not an admiralty court.)

18. It is my understanding that without my consent you can not force me or my freeholdings to be surety for this charge, isn't that correct?

19. Where do you want to go with this Sir?
- kidnapping?
- assault against a foreign official?
- piracy on the high seas?
- plunder?
- trafficking in slaves?

20.  Is it understood that I will not be referred to by an appellation that applies to a legal fiction procedural phantom?

21. Are you trying to coerce me into slavery by forcing me to confess to the status of a U.S. subject?

22. I am moving this court to dismiss this case with extreme prejudice (over and over again).

23. Judge, by calling me mister, it appears that you are operating under the assumption that I am an  ens legis U.S. person.  Just what are the assumptions here?  Are you assuming that I am consenting to these proceedings?  Are you assuming that I have elected to submit to the jurisdiction?  Is that your assumption, for and on the record?  Do you have a contract where I have confessed to being a U.S. subject?  Do you have a secret lien based upon the birth certificate, social security number or a bank account?  Is that where you want to go, to lock me up and attempt to coerce me to contract?  It is my understanding that you cannot lawfully proceed if I do not consent, and that you cannot lawfully make me consent.  Is this not correct?  Yes or no, for the record.

24. Since you have not objected to my status nor brought forth any reason why I should consent or any power to proceed without my consent, then I move to dismiss the case with extreme prejudice (essential sound bite).

25. Sir, you had better kill me and all of my friends because once I get out, if it takes me forty years I will collect on the liability which is attached to kidnapping and any of the other crimes that you commit in this courtroom against a living man on the land, and any one else who objects to my status as a living man on the land with a rebuttal or counter claim.  Do you want to digest that for the next couple of decades?

26. Sir, do you have a power of attorney to confess that name for me?

27. Sir would you like to step down and testify?  Raise your right hand and put your left hand on the bible, and lets see if you have the authority to be doing what you are doing here today. 

28. Please state your authority to come before me as a sovereign man on the free dry land?

29. Your silence is your agreement (essential sound bite).

30.  We do NOT repeat ourselves over and over again as that will predictably lead to a contempt threat.  Instead, we:
- request or inquire
- give notice of default and perhaps notice of barritry
- enforce, perhaps with a warrant for arrest of bond, a peace bond, an actual arrest, an order for someone else to arrest, a recusal, etc.

31. Sir, there is a question on the floor and you need to answer it on the record, and if you don't then I will answer it for you.  By what authority, venue of law, and jurisdiction are you here before me today so that I may understand the rules by which we are operating today?

32.  If they threaten contempt for asking questions: Fine, then I will ask for a judicial determination.  I need judicial determination on whether a request for a judicial determination can ever comprise contempt� I need judicial determination on whether a question about procedure, law or facts can ever comprise contempt�I will ask questions until I get answers.  Are you late for a round of golf?  Do you not have the time to answer or do you wish to proceed with a party that does not understand?

33. If they don't answer our questions, we assume their answer and read it into the record:  "I will take your silence to be your agreement."�"Let the record show that you failed to respond and therefore you agree, for the record, that you have misappropriated $500 million dollars of funds intended for public benefit."

34. Have you not been noticed of my declaration of political status which has been accepted and witnessed by three of public officials?

35. Have we not already established that I am the only sovereign here, and the supreme authority here, and that all of you have confessed that you are my public servants?  Here is my order.  I move for dismissal with extreme prejudice.  Or would you prefer to proceed ultra vires in felony breech of office, applying statutes against a sovereign man and without my consent?

36. Are you not aware of the civil contract that's in effect here?  I am the supreme authority here.  You are the public servant.  And I expect you to fulfill all of your lawful duties beginning with�

37. Perhaps you would step down and establish yourself as a sovereign man instead of a fiction magistrate.  Would you like to do that?...Does anybody wish to declare their sovereignty on the record?...Good, let the record show that I am the only sovereign man in the courtroom.  I am the undisputed supreme authority here.  Are there any objections?...Good.  Here are my instructions�

38. This is your court?  Do you happen to have a d/b/a filed with the county?  For the record Judge, is this court registered to do business with the secretary of state?  Are you an officer of a corporation noted in the books of the secretary of state?  Because if not, and if this is in fact your court, then you would be the surety of record for the criminal liability of operating a private court under the color of law.  Would that not be correct, for and on the record?
-Have you filed a UCC 1 against the court?
-Do you have a bill of sale for the court?
-Are you registered to do business with the state?
-Is this court registered on Dunn and Bradstreet?

39. For the record judge, what would be the venue by which you are claiming jurisdiction to hear those allegations?

40. It is my understanding that a sovereign man on the land is not subject to statutory authority according to your own Supreme Court.  Is that not true?...So I am stating for and on the record that I am a sovereign man on the free dry soil of the land.  Does anyone wish to object?  Do you have any evidence to the contrary?  Do you have a power of attorney granting you the authority to disqualify my chosen political status?

41. I do not consent to these proceedings or to liability to your corporate statutes.  I deny being a corporation. I deny being a procedural phantom of any sort.  Does any one have any cause to object?

42.  Do you not have notice of my political status in your possession?

43.  Has the world not been duly notified of my political status?

44.  So what are you going to do about it?  Do you want to go to kidnapping?  Slavery?  Assault on a foreign official?

45.  I won't be so forgiving if you mention those commercial charges (allegations) again after we have established their inapplicability to a sovereign.  Any such representation will comprise an enticement into slavery by coercing me into presenting myself as a U.S. person / subject falsely, against my will, and in contravention of the convention de la Hague of 1961.