----- Original Message -----

From: BSM Condell

To: 'John Wilson' ; 'astrojet2'

Sent: Monday, September 24, 2007 9:06 AM

Subject: RE: Your slowly slowly getting there John

In the case of the United States, the entity is distinct from the United States of America. Washington DC remains sovereign, and, by virtue of the never-repealed Articles of Confederation [which incidentally permit Canada enjoining in the union � something the anti North American Union folks overlook] has control of all interstate {intra USA} commerce, thereby bringing into its control the vast majority of Americans [who otherwise remain as Citizens of their respective States and not citizens of the United States].

 

In the matter of �we the people,� known popularly to derive from the preamble to the Constitution of the United States, it is imperative that no confusion between the �directors� of the sovereign state and the people over whom they would other than through contract have any power. There are various sneaky ways of achieving this goal and, owing to the foreign nature of this construct as the more determinable description of political reality in the US/USA, is likely to be rejected on account of imprecise proof. It is sufficient in this instance to refer to the Constitution and clearly define WHY the preamble begins �We the People of the United States�.� and ends ��.for the United States of America.� With two distinct entities now on the radar, further indicators of the power relationship can be sought. There is a number of instances in which the point is supported � some outlined in the enclosed unedited booklet.

 

As to the question of Common Law trumping Statute Law, this is certainly not true under the US (observe US not USA) system whose Constitution [properly forming a Corporation] reads at Art. 1, sec 10. : �No State shall [�] pass any [�] Law impairing the Obligation of Contracts [�].�

 

"The United States Government is a foreign corporation with respect to a state." [N.Y. v. re Merriam 36 N.E. 505; 141 N.Y. 479; affirmed 16 S.Ct. 1073; 41 L. Ed. 287], "Corpus Juris Secundum," vol. 20, pp. 1758.

 

&c.

 

As always, do not pass on this information until you have studied & verified it.

 

Barry Condell

---

From: John Wilson [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: 23 September 2007 02:44
To: astrojet2
Subject: Re: Your slowly slowly getting there John

 

Dear P.M.,

 

I still can't find, anywhere, a definition of "constitutor" as being that thing below.

 

There's no doubt that a Constitution is a contract...and any contract must comply with the 8 essential elements.

 

The corporations and laws created under a constitution ultimately are judged by the People, by way of Referenda and Juries.

 

Therefore, Government is, in reality, of, by and for the People.....let's not forget that, ie: Common Law overrules Statute Law.

 

Yours sincerely,

John Wilson.

 

----- Original Message -----

From: astrojet2

To: [email protected]

Sent: Saturday, September 22, 2007 10:17 PM

Subject: Your slowly slowly getting there John

 

John

 

You are slowly getting to the truth now in regards to "Statutory law'. You see the constitution is nothing more than a "Commercial Document" binding the "states" as sureties for the "National Debt'. Did you realize that section 13 of the 1936 income Tax, which is not available through austlii, is actually the TRADING WITH THE ENEMY ACT. Guess who the enemy is? yes You! (and every other billigerent that questions the National debt). 

 

�What is a Constitutor? � �One who by SIMPLE AGREEMENT becomes RESPONSIBLE for another�s debts. So when you adopt those kinds of things in your life you have to be CAREFUL what you�re adopting because the Constitution itself was a document WRITTEN TO REPAY A DEBT.� � David Parker

 

�The CONSTITUTION was NOT a document protecting the people. The Constitution was document CREATING THE CORPORATION and the existence of a political government on a NATIONAL and a FEDERAL basis. IT WAS A DUALITY OF GOVERNMENT.� � Jack Smith.

 

You would not listen before when people were trying to wake you up! Common law is still there because they don't have the power to get rid of the "Law". They have just OVERLAYED it with statutory law or better known as PUBLIC POLICY. The question is, where in these foreign courts do you find the common law? Once you have found this out you will realize what the remedy is. We are in captivity right now, every single man, woman and child, to the International bankers/United Nations. And Moses is not around to take us out of captivity!

He who holds the gold makes all the rules! he who has the gold also pays the bills!

 

John, You are living in GRACE right now! 

 

P.M

__________ NOD32 2544 (20070921) Information __________

This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
http://www.eset.com

__________ NOD32 2545 (20070923) Information __________

This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
http://www.eset.com