vaccines

Vaccine Outrage

<<< Back to Vaccines

On Friday June 13 2003 a High Court judge, Christopher Sumner ordered that the bloodstreams of two girls aged 4 and 10 should be injected with animal-derived proteins and viruses, formaldehyde, mercury, antibiotics, gelatin, carbolic acid, aluminium etc.

The Order was that the children should be injected with the MMR, DPT, meningitis etc vaccines ; expressly against the wishes of the mothers and at the request of the two absent, estranged fathers, one of whom is a convicted child sex offender who served a jail sentence for attempted rape and indecent assault of girls aged 10 and 11. He had changed his name and had not informed the mother of his history.

Sumner ignored the fact that the hearing should have been about whose decision was paramount with regard to the children�s welfare. He allowed two "expert witnesses", Dr. Conway and Professor Kroll, to turn the hearing into an advertisement for vaccination. Sumner was very impressed with the committees that the two served upon and regarded them as leading experts in the field. Amongst Kroll�s statements was " S before 1988 when the MMR jab was introduced, research shows that more than half of the acute measles deaths occurred in previously healthy children who had not been immunised."

VACCINE REALITY
"Research shows" nothing of the sort : there are NO cases where any healthy child has been killed or permanently damaged by measles. The deaths which have occurred have been in children who were severely malnourished and/or previously ill and/or who had their measles badly managed ie suppressed by the medical orthodoxy.

There is NO evidence that any vaccine is safe or effective : the only large-scale scientifically-valid trial concerning a vaccine, the BCG, resulted in more TB in the vaccinated group than in the controls. The basis for the world-wide multi-billion dollar vaccine enterprise is the myth that the smallpox vaccine was a health measure. The shot was an unmitigated disaster, causing tens of thousands of deaths world-wide and a colossal legacy of disease conditions : it should have seen a permanent ban on any and all vaccines.

NONE of the relevant graphs show any benefit from vaccination as to disease declines.

Vaccines do NOT immunise : raising antibody levels is not immunisation. ALL vaccinated children are vaccine damaged : it is merely a question of time, location and degree.

Vaccine side-effects, as recorded on the drug packaging, include severe diarrhoea, encephalitis, anorexia, anaphalaxis, arthritis, fevers, seizures, Guillain Barre Syndrome, SSPE and death.

Measles, mumps, whooping cough are NOT dangerous diseases : they are Nature�s way of clearing inheritted and acquired disease tendencies and of providing immunity to the child and their, subsequent, children.

All of which is totally at variance with the testimonies given by Conway and Kroll, whose views were praised by Sumner as being "based on learning and research" : unlike the views of Dr Jayne Donegan, acting for the mothers. The highly learned male judge and his equally eminent male advisors were in agreement.

No alternative anti-Establishment nonsense on the subject of God-given, life-saving vaccines had any place in that courtroom.

"I was rather taken aback by the rudeness and personal comments made by Dr Conway in his answer to my first statement. I can see now that it was part of a basic strategy : if the witness can be discredited then what they say can be discounted". Dr Donegan.

Over 2,000 cases of UK litigation, concerning the MMR alone, are now pending. The damage caused includes Crohn�s Disease, epilepsy, autism, ME, MS, diabetes, hearing and sight defects etc etc.

The mother of the older child has stated "This man has never paid a penny for her support. S He has never so much as sent her a birthday or Christmas card. But he keeps trying to get at me through her and I believe this court action .. is just another step in that direction. I don�t want her to have the vaccine but I have been threatened with prison S I don�t want her to see this man but I have been threatened again .. I�m the one who has brought her up, fed her, cared for and loved her but I don�t seem to have any say in this at all. .. she doesn�t want to see him. She says he frightens her."

The solicitors acting for the two men were Lester-Aldridge, Russel House, Oxford Rd Bournemouth and Larcombes, London Rd, Portsmouth.

Sumner�s outrageous judgement was rubber-stamped by 3 appeal court judges, Sedley, Evans and Thorpe on 30 July 03. One of them, Sedley, said that Sumner�s court had been fed "junk science". Absolutely correct ; and so had the appeal court and they all swallowed it, hook, line and sinker.

This judgement means that, now, our present toleration of the pro-vaccination lobby must cease. We must now stop playing at anti-vaccination and unite to take the vaccine reality information to the widest audience.

We must ensure that this judgement is the worst thing that has ever happened to the vaccine mafia.

Free leaflet or A4 sheet
VACCINATION � legalised child abuse. SAE
or A4 sheet by e mail attachment.
Pat Rattigan N.D.
NEMESIS PO Box 73 Chesterfield S41 0YZ
e mail [email protected]
NEMESIS by-passing the lie-machine

Back to top of Document