New Comment Posted to 'SARS - Pneumonia-like respiratory disease another gravy train... update'

<<< Back to main page

www.newmediaexplorer.org/cgi-bin/mt-comments.cgi?entry_id=1148

My classmate (young and healthy) contracted SARS from the first hospital case in Toronto. He nearly died. This is NOT like the flu. The Xrays look different, the lining of the lungs becomes filled with fluid, the recovery period is months not days. Millions are exposed to the flu and few (%-wise) become really ill. They usually recover with oxygen and perhaps antibiotics for secondary infection. Medical personnel rarely become ill. Older, weakened people tend to die. With SARS, few were infected but almost everyone who was infected including medical personnel became ill and required intensive care. The death rate for those infected was much higher than flu. SARS and flu are simply not in the same category of illness.

Posted by: Aliss on June 4, 2004 12:29 PM

Aliss,

This post is not about a particular disease per say like many fast acting diseases (ie Flesh-eating disease more properly called necrotizing fasciitis), IV vitamin C etc. could stop it in its tracks. Furthermore antibiotics the treatment of choice is enhanced substantially if needed all.

Wish more people would read the supporting data before condemning what is written in the post. If you want to get up to speed you need to read only one book by Dr. Levy mentioned in the post...

Like in Cancer the choice of the first treatment is often the determinant of the final outcome this is also true of many other diseases!

Death rates etc are a moot point if don't use the proper treatments. Most are and continue to be duped with only drug modalities as if there were/are no other options even when they are starring them in the face. It just happens, like you mention, oxygen alone (which if use properly could cure most diseases please follow the ref in the post).

Not only UV blood irradiation , IV Vitamin C and Hydrogen Peroxide, Oxygen and electromedicine modalities are based on sound technical grounds (which most drugs are not including antibiotics) they are very cost effective and generally not toxic to boot - And that, I am afraid, is the root of all our medical woos. Never mind what good nutrition and clean environments could do!

Posted by: Chris Gupta on June 4, 2004 04:59 PM

http://www.newmediaexplorer.org/chris/

Back to top of Document