HR  

Mexican Trade Barriers

<<< Back to United States Health Regulatory History

THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

COMMENTS OF

the American Herbal Products Association,
the Council for Responsible Nutrition, and
the National Nutritional Foods Association

ON

MEXICO'S BARRIERS TO TRADE IN DIETARY SUPPLEMENTS FOR INCLUSION IN THE NATIONAL TRADE ESTIMATE REPORT ON FOREIGN TRADE BARRIERS

December 12, 2003

The American Herbal Products Association (AHPA), the Council for Responsible Nutrition (CRN), and the National Nutritional Foods Association (NNFA) are U.S. national trade association in the dietary supplement industry, These organizations are comprised of companies doing business as processors, manufacturers, distributors and marketers of dietary supplements and serve their members by promoting the responsible commerce of these products. Background and Subject of these Comments

The United States Trade Representative (USTR) is required to publish annually the National Trade Estimate Report on Foreign Trade Barriers (NTE). In a Federal Register notice dated October 31, 2003, USTR's Trade Policy Staff Committee (TPSC) requested information in identifying significant barriers to U.S. exports of goods, among other things, in order to provide views relevant to the preparation of the annual NTE.

Most of the members of AHPA, CRN and NNFA are U.S. based companies that manufacture or process ingredients for dietary supplements or that market dietary supplements to consumers. Most of the members of these organizations therefore have an interest in assuring that preparation of the NTE reflects barriers to their export of U.S. manufactured dietary supplements into countries in which they could increase their exports their goods in the absence of such barriers. The comments provided here are therefore intended to identify one such barrier.

Barriers to export of dietary supplements to Mexico The Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA) defines dietary supplements as follows (21 U.S.C. 321(ff)):

The term "dietary supplement" - (1) means a product (other than tobacco) intended to supplement the diet that bears or contains one or more of the following dietary ingredients:

(A) a vitamin;
(B) a mineral;
(C) an herb or other botanical;
(D) an amino acid;
(E) a dietary substance for use by man to supplement the diet by increasing the total dietary intake; or (F) a concentrate, metabolite,
constituent, extract, or combination of any ingredient described in clause (A), (B), (C), (D), or (E);
(2) means a product that -
(A) (i) is intended for ingestion in a form described in section 350(c)(1)(B)(i) of this title; or (ii) complies with section 350(c)(1)(B)(ii) of this title;
(B) is not represented for use as a conventional food or as a sole item of a meal or the diet; and
(C) is labeled as a dietary supplement; and
(3) does -
(A) include an article that is approved
as a new drug under section 355 of this title or licensed as a biologic under section 262 of title 42 and was, prior to such approval, certification, or license, marketed as a dietary supplement or as a food unless the Secretary has issued a regulation, after notice and comment, finding that the article, when used as or in a dietary supplement under the conditions of use and dosages set forth in the labeling for such dietary supplement, is unlawful under section 342(f) of this title; and (B) not include -
(i) an article that is approved as a new drug under section 355 of this title, certified as an antibiotic under section 357 of this title, or licensed as a biologic under section 262 of title 42, or
(ii) an article authorized for investigation as a new drug, antibiotic, or biological for which substantial clinical investigations have been instituted and for which the existence of such investigations has been made public, which was not before such approval, certification, licensing, or authorization marketed as a dietary supplement or as a food unless the Secretary, in the Secretary's discretion, has issued a regulation, after notice and comment, finding that the article would be lawful under this chapter.
Except for purposes of paragraph (g), a dietary supplement shall be deemed to be a food within the meaning of this chapter.

Many U.S. based companies sell their dietary supplement products not only in the United States but also offer these for sale in numerous other countries. Because the class of goods can be defined differently in other countries, U.S. firms must sometimes reformulate or relabel products to prepare them for export. For example, many countries require labeling to be in the local language so a translated label will be required in order to conform to local labeling requirements.

These kinds of reasonable regulatory obstacle are generally seen as legitimate barriers to entry and a simple cost of doing business in a foreign market. Members of the trade associations that are submitting these comments have successfully overcome this kind of reasonable regulation, so that these associations are aware that U.S. based companies enjoy business opportunities in numerous countries, such as Canada, the United Kingdom, Italy, Spain, Germany, Russia, Brazil, Japan, Korea, Taiwan, China, Thailand, Malaysia, Australia, and South Africa, among others.

On the other hand, Mexico has established a regulatory structure through its General Health Law and supporting regulations that serves as a non-tariff trade barrier to appears to the importation and sale of U.S. produced dietary supplements in that country. The most significant obstacles have resulted from Mexico's standards and certification, including refusal to accept U.S. manufacturers self-certification of conformance to Mexico's manufacturing standards for dietary supplements. Specifically:

* Mexico classifies the majority of US produced dietary supplements, which are a subclass of foods in the U.S., as drugs (medicamentos) rather than as foods (alimentos). On the other hand, Mexican manufacturers can freely import numerous of their products that are classified as medicamentos in Mexico and sell these as dietary supplements in the U.S.

* Mexico requires that all medicamentos be manufactured in a licensed drug manufacturing facility by a licensed drug manufacturer. In comparison, U.S. regulations allow dietary supplements to be manufactured in food manufacturing facilities by companies licensed to manufacture and package food, and most U.S. produced dietary supplement are, in fact, manufactured to such standards and in such facilities. In comparison, Mexican manufacturers can import and sell dietary supplements in the U.S. that are manufactured without a drug license in food manufacturing facilities.

* Mexico requires that medicamentos be submitted to the Secretaria de Salud for pre-approval as drugs for importation and sale in Mexico. Pre-approval includes documentation of testing, ingredient disclosure and shelf life certification equal to drug standards that are well in excess of U.S. standards. These requirements contrast with the U.S. allowance for Mexican manufacturers to import and sell dietary supplements to the U.S. as foods, and without pre-approval by U.S. health authorities.

* Mexico requires U.S. companies wishing to import dietary supplements as medicamentos into Mexico to obtain prior certification that their manufacturing facility conforms to Mexico's current good manufacturing practice for drugs. Mexico has refused to accept U.S. manufacturers' self-certification or independent 3rd-party certification of such conformity. In addition, Mexico has not allowed its government employees to perform site visits at U.S. manufacturers' facilities to evaluate conformity with Mexican cGMPs.

* In summary, Mexico's regulatory system does not allow ready trade of U.S. dietary supplements as these are usually classed as medicamentos, thus requiring pre-approval for marketing and manufacture in facilities that are drug manufacturing facilities and that require inspection by Mexican authorities. U.S. companies that attempt to conform to these rules by pre-registering their products and by assuring that their U.S. manufacturing facilities are in compliance are stifled by the "Catch-22" of the Mexican government's insistence that only Mexican officials are qualified to inspect a facility but that these officials are not authorized to conduct inspections outside of Mexico.

AHPA, CRN and NNFA believe that Mexico has responsibilities under NAFTA and WTO to address the non-tariff trade barriers identified here. Industry estimates that a reasonable estimate of the potential annual increase in exports of U.S. produced dietary supplements to Mexico that would result from the removal of these barriers is in excess of $500 million.

Respectfully submitted,

Michael McGuffin
President, American Herbal Products Association
8484 Georgia Avenue, Suite 370
Silver Spring, MD 20910

John Hathcock
CRN

David Seckman
NNFA





Back to top of document