The truth about EMF radiation - spread it!
<<< Back to main page
Please find the enclosed PDF file about EMF radiation (Omega: under
www.buergerwelle.de/pdf/english_emf_folder.pdf)
Spread it through your network, to family and friends and tell everyone
to do the same.
This will end up being the biggest health scandal ever if we don't stop it!
Take very much care and keep shining.
All the best
The Truth - May Justice Prevail!
Informant: Sandheden
Next to the Stanford Research
Dear Klaus.
I was waiting for the next news but that issue was never appear in my
e-folder. Consequently, I never got any mail from the visitors of you
site. Klaus. Aspect of your site involved in the discussing regarding of
microwave and related to those topics. Ironically it is very close to
what my family is experiencing on daily bases. Our residence has been
bombarded by some kind of wave and an effect of it, - at least
physically noticeable- our voices getting sounded very law. The face
becomes tired. What we are reading in your e-magazine, those who are
involve in the activity perhaps may suggest us what to do to stop this
outrage terror. As I remember, many years ago US Government has accused
Russians in deliberately transmitting microwaves signals at the US
Embassy in Moscow. An effect of such an outrage act was similar what I'd
just described to you above. Klaus. I do know that many people would
share with my family information that possibly could help us end
electromagnetic horror we are going through. As I mention above, that
issue where you suppose to place our request, was never arrived on my
e-account. So. Please repeat if it's OK.
Ed. Kats
Irish T.V. reports on Irish farmer adverse bioeffects from his farm mast
Last eve, December 4th, a popular R.T.E. (Radio Telefis Eireann)
half-hour weekly program, "Ear to the Ground" that focuses mostly on
farm issues around Ireland, gave over its first part to the plight of
John Ryan, Cashel, Co. Tipperary, a young Irish farmer who is now
suffering severe bioeffects from the mast he allowed to be erected on
his farm, early in 2003. Shortly after this mast became operant, John
experienced such debilitating effects as muscle weakness and overall
weakness plus severe burning of his face when working on his farm. His
wife Rosie described it as "frightening" to watch John's agony and his
face going from red to purple. To recover, he had to get into his car
and drive off the farm. Only then, away from the farm and its mast would
his severe bioeffects fade away. Regrettably, he had contracted to keep
the mast on his property for a set number of years but Rosie mused that
their health situation is so bad they may just have to leave their own farm.
A well known Irish I.D.E.A. (Irish Doctors Environmental Association)
doctor, Dr. Philip Michael from Bantry, Co. Cork, was interviewed as
well on this EHS problem. Dr. Michael said that increasing number of
patients are coming to him with what he would describe as EHS symptoms
from cellphones and masts. Then a divergent opinion on the health dangers
posed by masts was sought from Professor Werner Blau, Head of the
Department of Physics, Trinity College Dublin. He pointed out that there
was no conclusive evidence that the radiation from masts, etc., could
cause adverse effects.
Generally, however, it has been a terrific plus to our recognition of
EHS campaign that this report actually featured on prime time Irish
television. Just think of all the Irish farmers and other citizens who
have now been alerted to the whole EHS scene.
Best, Imelda, Cork.
Message from a reader
Just a short note to tell you how valuable your news coverage is to me.
Thank you.
Prof. Reba Goodman
Department of Pathology
Columbia University
New York, NY USA
Re: From Denmark
Hi!
Somewhat confused, I�m wondering what means by this: "However, already
now Mild urged to apply the Precautionary Principle in the use of mobile
phones."
I can not at all see the logic in this. Did Mr Hanson-Mild really said
that or is this a interpretation of what he said? (I had a fight only
two years ago, when Mild promptly said that speaking of masts and the
radiation emitting from masts there are no need to worry at all. There
are many other sources such as radio, television and so on so emitting
from 3G mobile masts is nothing to worry about. Then, I did not like his
statement, and opposed it strongly. Today I don�t like it even lesser.
Mr Milds position on masts today is somewhat unclear. He is
concentrating to the mobile phone (thanks to Mr Lennart Hardell).
But the question was about the precautionary principle: WHEN, to be more
specific, is it to be applied?
Yours Sincerely
Jan �berg
electrotechnician
and investigative journalist
and
Hi, It is now fairly well established that the IEEE/WHO/ICNIR standards
for SAR and other exposure "standards" so called based on "heating
effect" do not tell the whole story on the effects of exposure of humans
of all ages, both genders and the range of physical sizes to RF at HF
and above.
It has been known and shown repeatedly that there are bio-electrical
effects that start at very low levels. Between 1/1000 and 1/10000 of the
current "standard'. Further it is the type of modulation or intelligence
placed on the RF that is significant; with pulsed signals being far
worse then radio (AM or FM) and TV signals (that contain vestige
sideband "sync pulses�) some where in the middle as far as effects are
concerned.
Basicly the mechanism is beloved to be the cells and certain organs such
as the middle ear, acting as a demodulator or detector resolving the
envelope pattern of the RF signal. Where the demodulated signal has
components at the various bio-active frequencies that are used for
internal signals by the human body, they may be swamped by this "false"
RF demodulated signal. These "false" signals interfere with the body's
regulation at all levels from inside cells up to major sense organ
inputs to the brain.
The results are to be seen at the cell level as calcium efflux, at the
near level as false sensation, tingling, vertigo, sweating, cold
sweating, tremors, flushes and other well known symptoms of RF exposure.
In the limit, caused by the effects of direct RF exposure of the brain,
hearing noise, seeing flashes, headaches, dizziness to the point of
falling over, can be the result.
All the effects appear to be worse as the frequency is raised. A serious
side effect of exposure at frequencies above 150 Mhz, (that is VHF and
above), is that body parts can become resonant absorbers, which raises
the amount of energy taken in, and reduces the threshold exposure level
at which effects are seen.
The range of variation of human "size" of hand, arm, leg etc within
gender and age groups explains in part why some people are more affected
than others.
All the above has been widely known for some 40 years, as these effects
were first documented by Russian scientists from the late 1950s onward.
When it first became known in the "West" the US/NATO (yes the Yanks),
dismissed it as black propaganda. Since 1990 the IEEE have repeatedly
attempted to "harmonize" the Russian standards by raising the "safe"
levels in Russia upwards by 1000 times. The answer is still NO.
The driving force behind maintaining the high unsafe standard in the
West (UK/EU/USA/Can/Aus/NZ) is the financial implication for the cold
war warriors.
If the lower standard were adopted the MILITARY would need to purchase
many square miles of land around their high power radar and radio sites
to remove the public from areas where the lower standard said was unsafe.
The MILITARY could also expect to pay out vast sums in successful death
and injury claims to ex-military and civilian persons who have been
affected by exposure to previously consider "safe" RF levels.
Eventually common sense, and the case against the current RF exposure
standards will prevail, as it did in the case of tobacco.
In the mean time we are all subject to passive RF exposed while the
"cell-idiots" deafen everyone with their conversations and spread the
risk of pain or death to all around them.
Message from dja.
PS I spent most of my working life involved with radio safety and radio
propagation involving high power sites from VLF to millimeter waves.
Passive Radar
Friends and Associates: The technology described in this article is
absolutely astonishing, but I commend it to your attention for another
reason as well. What it means is that we are now spending our lives in
such a thick soup of electromagnetic radiation that it is possible to
track people going about their business by picking up the pressure wave
they create as they proceed, and the wake they leave behind. It's just
like tracking a ship in the ocean. I know people are dead forever after
say 3 minutes under water. How long is it going to take us all to die in
the EM soup we are now paddling around in????? Harlan Girard
Back to top
