Here's the bad news...
It's a sad day all!
As you probably guessed by my lateness, I lost.
I've been reviewing since 11am how to appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada the BC Court of Appeals' unanimous decision to dismiss my appeal, and have just now concluded that review.
Why did they dismiss my appeal you ask?
Well, the only reason they gave (and it was a quick oral decision, not in writing - a copy of the oral judgment will be delivered to me in 2 weeks) was that since the trial judge "correctly" found that "mainstream" scientific bodies (i.e. Health Canada, CDA, WHO, etc.) support public water fluoridation as "safe and effective", they could not "interfere" with the trial judge's Reasons For Judgment dismissing my claims; even though I argued that the most "mainstream" view of fluoridation in Canada was the Health Canada's 1999 Locker Report and it didn't find that fluoridation was safe or effective, and that the most "mainstream" fluoride researcher/scientist in Canada (Dr. Hardy Limeback) doesn't support public water fluoridation anymore (since 1999) calling it "outdated and dangerous to the health of consumers" and that all 1500 scientists and professional employees at the U.S. EPA headquarters in Washington D.C. (the MOST "mainstream" scientific body in the U.S.) are "unanimously" opposed to fluoridation since 1986 for the same reasons of Dr. Limeback!!!
THEY DIDN'T'T GIVE TWO SHITS!!!
They explained that since the trial judge was "correct" in finding that the "mainstream" view of public water fluoridation was that it is "safe and effective" they did not have to deal with any of my arguments raised at appeal ( i.e that fluoridation is: 1) unlawfully poisoning people leading to disfiguring dental fluorosis, skeletal fluorosis, bone fractures, cancer, pre-mature death, etc.; 2) unlawfully drugging people without informed consent; 3) unconstitutional under s. 7, 12 and 15 as it is arbitrary as it "bears no relation" to providing the "optimal daily dose" of fluoride today as this dose is already provided to children (since the 70's) just by the amount of fluoridated toothpaste they ingest or by the amount of fluoride they ingest in food!!!)
Oh well, I called the 3 Justice's the "poisoning bench" as they exited and told them that "I felt sorry for their grandchildren".
Needless to say, 4 armed guards escorted me out of the court. The end.
So, where does Kevin Millership go from here - home!
Then, I have 60 days to file an "application for leave to appeal in forma pauperis" to the Supreme Court of Canada (in forma pauperis is a specific application for leave to appeal for us poor guys to avoid paying court costs at the Supreme Court of Canada - no filing fees, etc.). It will be filed by the end of this month!
And if all goes right, I'm off to the Supreme Court of Canada to FINALLY receive the justice I/we so richly deserve!!!
I'll keep you informed...
PS: I know someone who's very happy right now - SATAN!
PSS: No worries, Judgment Day is coming - my Judgment Day in the Supreme Court of Canada and everyone's Judgment Day of God!
Aloha.
Your down-and-out-but-not-defeated-friend, Kev
PSSS: To get leave to appeal I have to show three things:
1) a novel (drugging/poisoning/death by fluoridation) constitutional issue;
2) other provinces in Canada have similar legislation as B.C.'s Local Government Act which allows fluoridation (they do); and
3) an important question of law (Can you arbitrarily poison and drug and kill people in Canada by fluoridation?) requires revisitation by the Supreme Court of Canada.THE FIGHT CONTINUES!!!