Fluoride in drinking water; was: From Hardy Limeback
I've followed this list for a few years and don't recall heated discussions specific to fluoride. I posted my affirmation against public supplementation in drinking water without one reply from the HF list. I would like to know if there were/are hostile reaction to anti-fluoride sentiment on this list, and whether the lawsuit was about shutting-up a fluoride opinion or shutting up a libelous person who happened to also be against fluoride.
If there are not other list comments to this issue, Dr. Pilon is free to convey my observations of this list as an example of the current sentiments about fluoride in drinking water that exists here.
Dale
www.ssr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?1:mss:92197:200410:dlobcgdbpooifclapigo
P.S. BTW, the fluoride initiative passed in my county, and taxpayers will begin paying for municiple supplementation.
Mike on the Bike [email protected] wrote:
Mike on the Bike
Dr Michael Pilon
VE3BUP
Check the MP3's on
www.bobcatgray.comHi Mike:
I'll take any of them on point-by-point and prove to them that continuation of fluoridation today is a fraudulant activity.
After spending a 1 year on the National Academy of Sciences Subcommittee on Fluoride in Drinking Water, learning more than any dentist or MD will ever know about fluoride toxicity, my position against adding H2SiF6 to the water is even stronger than ever. The NAS will be publishing its findings in 2005.
Hardy (pass this e-mail on to the 'quack watch' people if you like- I would love to see their comments....any directed at me personally in a negative way- in attempt to sully my repuation-, rather than at the science, can be constituted as libel. Since they already tried to shut up one US citizen opposed to fluoridation with a lawsuit, let them try me next. I know of a couple of great lawyers who would defend me).
Quoting Mike on the Bike :
From the healthfraud list :) You are indeed famous :)