The AIDS Epidemic at 25: The Hidden Benefits and Design Behind the
Devastation
Jerry Leonard
6/05/06
The catastrophic international AIDS epidemic is now 25 years old. It has
killed 25 million people around the world and is projected to kill 100
million more in Africa alone. According to a director of UNAIDS, this
disease has caused "the worst and deadliest epidemic that humankind has
ever
experienced."
And yet, after two and a half decades and all this human carnage,
"experts"
and commentators would have you believe they are still confused as to how
AIDS jumped the species barrier to cause this hideous viral cancer
epidemic
in humans. A June 3 report by the Associated Press summarized:
Nobody knows for sure when or where ... a virus lurking in the blood of a
monkey or a chimpanzee made the leap from one species to another....
Enough is enough.
I believe the mechanism of the sudden species leap is there for all to see
in the published research of a viral cancer vaccine program conducted
shortly before the epidemic began. We just have to read it.
Indeed, the unique characteristics of the AIDS virus, HIV, along with the
hidden benefits the epidemic is providing to cancer vaccine researchers,
point to it being the designed result of a major development effort
quietly
funded through a long-running government project known as The Special
Virus
Cancer Program.
Many of the experts who pretend to be scratching their heads over where
HIV
originated were, in fact, involved in this massive project run by the
National Cancer Institute to create human versions of animal cancer
viruses
for vaccine research. Just a few years before the AIDS/cancer epidemic
became public knowledge, they were busy publishing technical papers
describing their successful efforts at growing monkey AIDS viruses in
human
cancer cell cultures.
Some History
Studying pre-AIDS cancer virus research literature shows viruses like HIV
were the culmination of decades of animal research with viruses engineered
to do exactly what HIV does--selectively knock out the immune system to
make
cancer viruses grow more reproducibly for vaccine research.
My research has shown that as early as 1962 cancer vaccine researchers had
isolated and tested an immunosuppressive virus, which later researchers
admitted was capable of inducing ��a severe immunodeficiency disease with
striking similarities to human AIDS.�� But the experts won't tell you
that.
And they were busy modifying these animal immunodeficiency viruses, even
combining them with sarcoma viruses and growing them in human cell
cultures,
shortly before the HIV-induced sarcoma epidemic mysteriously broke out in
human populations. They won't tell you that either.
Curiously, these viral modifications never stopped. World-renowned
virologists including Robert Gallo used the tools of their trade to make
HIV
even more deadly and infectious than it already was--and published the
results--even as the pandemic wreaked devastation across the globe.
In my short e-book How To Make An AIDS Virus, I reveal, in layman's terms,
the fascinating story of how animal immunodeficiency viruses similar to
HIV
were quietly optimized in the decades before AIDS-induced cancers began
making international headlines. I also show how techniques developed in
animal vaccine research were used to modify these novel viruses to make
them
replicate in human cells so researchers could then replicate successful
animal experiments in human subjects.
As a contribution to the ongoing effort to identify the source of AIDS and
eliminate it, I am making this e-book free to the public. (For a pdf
version
of this click here.)
Human Experiments For Vaccine Development: Immunoproficiency through
Immunodeficiency?
With this knowledge of cancer vaccine experimentation behind the
development
of viruses like HIV, it should not come as too great a surprise that the
global immune system devastation caused by this unprecedented virus is
quietly benefiting cancer vaccine researchers. In fact, it is fulfilling
their long-term research goals in a stunning, step-by-step fashion.
Indeed, HIV has done exactly what immunosuppressive viruses were
engineered
by the viral cancer establishment to do--selectively deplete the immune
system so that the effects of cancer viruses could be increased, measured
and correlated with immune system health. The knowledge gained by
monitoring
the viral cancer epidemic caused by HIV has allowed vaccine researchers to
simultaneously prove their coveted "viral cancer source" hypothesis and
their "immunosurveillance" theory of susceptibility to these viruses.
These
goals were seen as milestones on the path to developing human cancer
vaccines, which numerous researchers predict will be one of the legacies
of
the HIV-induced cancer epidemic.
In another e-book Why AIDS Was Invented (which I am also releasing to the
public), I propose that these benefits of the HIV epidemic to cancer
researchers are not accidental but are instead the culmination of a
long-running line of dangerous experiments in which increasingly
sophisticated cancer-inducing techniques developed in animal research were
systematically applied to humans.
These published experiments include the human "tumor transplant" research
of
Chester Southam (a future president of the American Association of Cancer
research) and follow-up experiments in which animal cancer viruses, such
as
monkey sarcoma viruses, were mixed with human cancer cells and injected in
humans to create a laboratory model of tumor growth for vaccine research.
I propose that when researchers added monkey AIDS viruses to these
human-adapted monkey sarcoma cultures (and published the results) they
were
simply complementing this line of research by replicating an experimental
model perfected through decades of successful animal vaccine research.
This
was to use immunosuppressive viruses to artificially create the immune
system defects that vaccine theorists postulated made the cancer viruses
grow more reproducibly in nature. Laboratory validation of these
hypothesized mechanisms would thereby pinpoint which immune system defects
might be effectively counteracted with vaccines. (I have called this
research technique the creation of immunoproficiency through the
manipulation of immunodeficiency.)
Questions that come to mind include the following:
�P Were these artificially adapted mixtures of monkey sarcoma and
immunodeficiency viruses used in human research? And,
�P Could this explain why the international epidemic of viral
immunosuppression and viral sarcoma is benefiting the research
establishment
that isolated such viruses? And, if so,
�P How were these tests conducted?
My research has convinced me that vaccines were not only the goal behind
the
development and unleashing of HIV but also the source of the epidemic, as
well.
The effort to create profitable cancer vaccines is but one factor behind
the
AIDS epidemic. My book AIDS: The "Perfect" Disease summarizes my theory
for
how the HIV virus was created by the biological warfare establishment
behind
the scenes by funding this cancer virus research. In this work, I also
describe why I believe the AIDS epidemic itself was created through a
biological warfare exercise conducted under the pretext of an
international
cancer vaccine experiment using HIV-contaminated vaccines.
I believe this theory not only explains why HIV is quietly achieving goals
clearly spelled out by vaccine researchers prior to AIDS, but also
explains
�P Why HIV selectively depletes T-cells, the very class of immune
cells targeted by cancer researchers with a documented history of human
cancer transplant experimentation.
�P Why HIV is selectively depleting human populations to fulfill
policy goals articulated by national security planners in classified
memoranda written prior to the epidemic. In 2000, 90 percent of AIDS
deaths
occurred in the Third World, the location where an alarmed National
Security
Council predicted in a classified 1974 pre-AIDS-era study that 90 percent
of
world population increases would occur by the year 2000, unless drastic
measures were taken.
�P Why homosexuals were the first victims in the U.S. They had
high
rates of suspected cancer virus infection, monitored infections from which
might validate the immunosurveillance model of cancer as their immune
systems started to degrade, and, they were pre-selected for an
experimental
vaccine that was later used in an international cancer vaccine experiment.
�P Why Africans are being disproportionately devastated by the
disease. They not only had high population rates (according to a 1996 New
York Times article, Africa was ��the continent with the world��s
fastest-expanding population��), but also had infections of viruses that
researchers were studying as potential cancer viruses for vaccines. The
methods by which ��immunodeficiency syndromes�� would elucidate the
mechanisms of cancer susceptibility to such viruses were of intense
interest
to the cancer vaccine researchers well before Acquired immunodeficiency
syndromes curiously dovetailed with this interest.
In addition to the long-term national security and cancer vaccine benefits
of AIDS, there is yet another hidden dimension to the story--the manner in
which the AIDS epidemic is fulfilling the goals of a long-running eugenics
program started by the U.S. before World War II.
My book Hitler Is Winning explains why AIDS is the perfect disease for
implementing this ongoing "racial hygiene" program that sought to harness
the processes of evolution (natural selection and speciation) to create a
society more in line with the eugenic ideals of perfection. By acting as a
means of "unnatural selection" AIDS will serve as a mechanism for
eliminating so-called undesirables on a global scale. Modified versions of
HIV, which are apparently extremely well suited for use as viral vectors
in
human genetic therapy research, may even serve as a means of synthetic
species modification. Moreover, the nature of the epidemic itself will
serve
as a justification for conducting this eugenic research under the guise of
medical intervention.
In my book, I explain how powerful American corporate elites set up the
German medical infrastructure to carry out the Nazis' far-reaching
eugenics
program. This program was implemented under the pretext of disease control
to confront an artificially created typhus epidemic. (The initial rounding
up of the victims through the ghettoization process and their imprisonment
in overcrowded and unsanitary death camps where they were experimented on
in
vaccine research and then disposed of through "disinfection rituals" using
a
poison insecticide gas were all accomplished under the guise of preventing
typhus.)
I propose that when we hired numerous Nazi biowarfare experts following
the
war, we also used them to continue the eugenics program through the
American
and international medical infrastructure. (Through Project Paperclip, we
used Nazi biowarfare experts as consultants to set up American biological
warfare testing labs and to conduct biowarfare experiments on American
troops. Nazi scientists subsequently found their way to the top of
international medical and humanitarian organizations.)
I have also suggested that this eugenics program is being implemented
using
research techniques similar to those used by the Nazis. For example, the
Nazis conducted biological warfare research under the pretext of cancer
research, including human vaccine experimentation on deliberately infected
subjects, and the transferring of monkey diseases to man. I believe AIDS
is
the result of similar human vaccine research involving the transfer of
deadly monkey diseases to man by biowarfare researchers under the pretext
of
cancer vaccine research.
I propose this led to an artificial epidemic that will allow the
implementation of this eugenics program, just like the artificially
created
typhus epidemic did in Nazi Germany. Only this time the effects will be
even
more catastrophic.
Summary
We are 25 years into the epidemic caused by HIV. Africa is dying (the
progress made fighting the disease in the developed world has not reached
the Third World) and virologists are continually improving the infectious
properties of this virus. We can no longer afford to plead ignorance of
where this virus came from and whose interests the associated epidemic
serves. We must understand the tools that are available to the biological
warfare infrastructure and prevent them from creating future epidemics. I
hope that my work will be a useful tool in this fight.
Jerry Leonard
[email protected]
www.winstonsmith.net
Back to top of Document